This Real Deal comes from partners Catherine Francis and Mary Scharf.
| Vul:E-W Dlr: South | AQ K1098652 A4 J3 | |||||||
K109864 Q7 1092 74 | J7532 J43 85 Q86 | |||||||
-- A KQJ763 AK10952 |
| West | North | East | South | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1![]() | ||||||||||||
| Pass | 1![]() | Pass | 3![]() | |||||||||
| Pass | 3![]() | Pass | 4![]() | |||||||||
| Pass | 4![]() | Pass | 6![]() | |||||||||
| All Pass |
What a wild deal—the most dramatic I can remember since I started writing this column in 2009.
With a huge 2-suiter, it is best not to open 2
; it gets the auction too high too quickly—and the opener will have trouble mentioning both suits at a reasonable level. Accordingly, South opens 1
(with equal-length suits, always open in the higher-ranking one). At this vulnerability, West doesn’t have enough to enter the auction, and we will assume East-West are silent throughout.
North has enough for game, but has no choice but to respond 1
for now (2/1 Abbreviation for Game Forcing GF is not a jump; 1
-2
would not show this kind of hand). South bids clubs next, but jumpshifts to show the powerful hand. 1
-1
-3
is natural and forcing to game.
North wants to repeat the hearts and since the partnership is forced to game, there is no need to jump; so North bids 3
. South now repeats the clubs (bidding 4
). This shows at least 5 clubs and 5 or more diamonds. Now what?
North expects at least a small slam (with 14 HCP facing a game-forcing opener who has about 18-20 in playing strength). For now, North should take a preference back to opener’s first suit by bidding 4
. This is the first time a trump suit is agreed in the auction. Sure, North could use A 4NT bid to ask for aces (or in RKC, keycards) Blackwood over 4
, but without a trump suit set, it would just be a guess as to how to follow up.
With South facing diamond support, he wants to be in 7
if partner has the
A (hoping there is a way to deal with the third round of clubs). How can opener find out about the key
A? It isn’t easy. One way is to use A 4NT bid to ask for aces (or in RKC, keycards) Blackwood (something we try not to do with a void). If North shows no aces, South knows to stop in 6
. If North shows 2 aces, South knows to bid 7
. But, what if North has only one ace? South wouldn’t know which one. If it were the
A and South bid 7
, he would find out before the auction is over that he made a mistake (he would get doubled by the player holding the
A). This is why A 4NT bid to ask for aces (or in RKC, keycards) Blackwood with a void (though it would work here) is not a good idea.
There are two scientific ways to find out about specifically the
A, but both are fraught with memory danger. I don’t even want to explain them, because they come up once a decade and it is impossible to remember such things. If anyone simply must know, I recommend googling “Grand Slam Force” or “Exclusion Blackwood.” If you have any questions, send them to my Antarctica office. Some things in bridge are just not practical to learn/study. Students always ask me: “but how?” I don’t think it is practical to learn things that never will come up—it just clutters the brain and gets students mixed up about really important things.
I think the practical approach at this point is for opener to settle for 6
. Even if responder has the
A, there is no guarantee that 7
will be laydown. If you think you can scientifically reach the grand slam, good luck to you.
The Play
How should the play go in 6
? No matter what the lead, 12 tricks looks easy. Declarer can try to make an overtrick by not losing to the
Q. Should he take a club finesse or try to trump a third club in dummy? If in only 6
, laying down the
AK is a big risk. What if an opponent trumps and returns a trump? Now, even 6
is likely to go down. So, in 6
, I think I would draw trump and play clubs from the top—holding myself to 6 on the actual layout.
(After trumps are drawn, there is no dummy entry for a club finesse). One possibility is to draw only 2 rounds of trump ending in dummy and then running the
J. This also risks the contract because it could lose to Qxxx and now a club ruff would be down 1. At matchpoints, though, it might be worth the risk. At team scoring, I would just draw trump and play on clubs.
In 7
, it is a tough choice between a club finesse and playing clubs from the top. The problem with the ace-king of clubs is that when you play the next club, you might have to trump with dummy’s
A and then 4-1 trumps could set you.
On the actual layout any reasonable line to try for all 13 tricks will work, but I’d be content to stop in 6
and not have to fret over the best way to play for 7.
Lesson points:
1) With a strong 2-suiter, try not to open 2
.
2) With 5-5 or 6-6 always open in the higher-ranking suit.
3) Once in a GF, there is no rush to use A 4NT bid to ask for aces (or in RKC, keycards) Blackwood until a trump fit is found.
4) Don’t use A 4NT bid to ask for aces (or in RKC, keycards) Blackwood with a void.
5) It isn’t practical to study or learn about obscure conventions that never come up.
6) At team scoring, don’t risk your contract for an overtrick.