You open 1NT. You hold:
K 9 3
K J 2
A Q 3 2
Q 9 2
Partner bids 2
, and you accept the transfer by bidding 2
.
Now, partner bids 3NT, offering you a choice of games. Which game?
Should you pass, or correct to 4
? Does it depend on whether it is IMPs or Matchpoints?
These are often difficult decisions. I'd probably opt for 4
with this hand (at either form of scoring), but it is very close. Change the clubs to
QJx, or maybe even
Q10x, and I'd pass. With a side doubleton, I'd "always" go back to the major. With a doubleton in partner's suit, I'd almost always play 3NT. With 4-3-3-3, I'd often choose notrump.
But, here is my special tip. Everything changes when you face this same dilemma after a two notrump opener. Change the above hand to:
A K J
K Q 10
A Q 3 2
Q 9 2
You open 2NT and partner transfers to 3
, then bids 3NT. Your call?
This is now an easy removal to 4
. In fact, whenever partner transfers to a major after your 2NT and then bids 3NT, I recommend playing in the major every time you have 3 card support.
Why?
Because after 2NT, partner doesn't have room. When he transfers and bids 3NT he can be offshape. Don't assume he has a nice balanced 5-3-3-2 shape. He could have a singleton. Consider this hand:
A 4 3
Q 10 5 4 3
8 7 6 4
3
After partner's 2NT, what else could you do but transfer to hearts and then bid 3NT? This would be the right contract opposite, say:
K J 2
A 2
A K Q 3 2
K 10 2
After a one notrump opener, when responder transfers and then bids 3NT, he is balanced. He can't have a singleton (he would have bid out his shape). But, after a two notrump opener, responder will often have a side singleton. He has no room to show his shape--he is forced into showing his major and then bidding 3NT with numerous 5-4-3-1 patterns. He could even be 5-5, something like:
J
K J 6 4 2
10 8 4 3 2
10 2
Opposite my partner's 2NT, I see no other option but to transfer to hearts and then bid 3NT, offering a choice of games between 3NT and 4
. This hand is not good enough (or strange enough) to transfer to hearts and then persist with 4
, maybe bypassing a laydown 3NT.
So, as the 2NT opener, I am always aware that my partner's transfer-then-3NT sequence does not guarantee a balanced hand.
This is why my tip for the month is :
When partner offers you a choice after your 2NT opener, "never" leave it in 3NT when you have 3 card support.
Special related bonus tip:
Consider this auction:
| 1NT | 2 |
2 | 2NT |
| ?? | |
Let's say the 1NT opener has a minimum. He has 3-card trump support and a flat hand (say, 4-3-3-3). Should he pass 2NT, or correct to 3
?
My advice: "Always" correct to the suit. Why? Use the same logic as the main article above. The responder might not be 5-3-3-2. He might have a singleton. Consider this hand for the responder:
Q
J 8 6 5 2
A 3 2
Q 5 3 2
He transfers and wants to invite game. He can't bid 3
next, because that would be forcing to game. His only choice is to transfer to hearts and then bid 2NT invitational.
Because the 2NT-bidder in these auctions will sometimes have a singleton, the opener should always correct to 3 of the major. Contrast this with:
| 1NT | 2 |
2 | 3NT |
| ?? | |
Now, responder won't have any singletons. If he was offshape he could have easily bid his second suit. On this auction, opener will often choose notrump if he is 4-3-3-3.
(For a related article see: "Should I Transfer" )