opening bid.
I've had a partner who went minus 7,000 on a deal.
A More Unlikely Bid!
by Larry Cohen
I've seem some strange things in my 30+ years of playing. I've
held a 5
opening bid.
I've had a partner who went minus 7,000 on a deal.
But, in 2005, I saw something I've never seen before. In the National Open Pairs in Denver, my partner opened with a 7-bid! Yes a real-life 7-opening!
After three passes, David Berkowitz held:
--
A K
Q J 10 4 2
A K J
8 4 3
--
He opened the bidding 7!
Why not? If partner has the Q,
it should be easy. Even if partner doesn't have the Q,
the grand slam might make. If he has shortness, you can hope to ruff a diamond
in dummy. If he has some length, you can hope the queen drops under the
ace-king. I suppose the worst holding is three low ones, but even then you have
good chances.
This was the full deal:
| 9 6 5 3 |
Vul: N-S | ||
| 9 5 3 |
Dlr: West | ||
| -- |
|||
| A J 9 8 7 2 |
|||
| K J 8 4 2 |
A Q 10 7 |
||
| 6 |
8 7 |
||
| Q 9 7 2 |
10 6 5 |
||
| 10 4 3 |
K Q 6 5 |
||
| -- |
|||
| A K Q J 10 4 2 |
|||
| A K J 8 4 3 |
|||
| -- |
|||
| WEST | NORTH | EAST | SOUTH |
| Pass | Pass | Pass | 7! |
| Pass | Pass | Pass | |
West (correctly) led a trump, but with the diamonds behaving, declarer had no
problem. He ruffed two diamonds in dummy and made all 13 tricks. Plus 2210 was a
good matchpoint score. At many tables, East opened 1 in third seat. That
eventually induced West to find the good sacrifice in 7X.
What should South do after that 1 opening? Many used a
Michaels bid -- probably the best Michaels bid in tournament history! The North
players had a nice hand in support of hearts and often bid hearts themselves
(freely). The South players probably wanted to bid 8! (Speaking of which, I
myself wanted to raise my partner's 7 to 8 -- I thought I had a very
good dummy).
So, now I've witnessed a legitimate 5 opening and a 7 opening. Will I live long
enough to see every opening bid?