Landing on My Feet
(If not in my suit)

 

Much will be written about the dramatic semifinal and final matches in the U.S. Team Trials that took place in Texas in May, 2005. In the quarterfinals, two deals piqued my interest. Both deals caused me great discomfort in the auction.

First, with nobody vulnerable, I held:

s.gif (111 bytes) Q 3
h.gif (112 bytes) A Q J 9 7 6 4 3
d.gif (109 bytes) Q 8 6
c.gif (113 bytes) --

My partner, David Berkowitz, opened a strong club and my RHO overcalled 1s.gif (111 bytes). I bid 2h.gif (112 bytes), natural and GF. LHO raised to 2s.gif (111 bytes) and partner bid 3c.gif (113 bytes), natural--not a surprise. I persisted with 3h.gif (112 bytes), planning on reaching at least 4h.gif (112 bytes), maybe 6h.gif (112 bytes). Over my 3h.gif (112 bytes), partner jumped to 5c.gif (113 bytes). Ugh! He has long clubs and wants to play in 5c.gif (113 bytes).
 
Can his be better than mine? Am I really going to table an 8-card suit in dummy (one of the no-no's of bridge)? Are we really going to play in 5-of-a-minor when I have ace-queen-jack-eighth of hearts? I reluctantly passed and this was the full deal:

Dealer North
None Vul
     Larry
     ♠ Q3
      AQJ97643
      Q86
     ♣ -
West      East
♠ 98764   ♠ AJ5
 K102     85
 AJ52     K10974
♣ 4       ♣ 763
     David
     ♠ K102
      -
      3
     ♣ AKQJ109852
West     Larry    East     David    
         Pass     Pass     1♣1      
1♠       2       2♠       3♣       
Pass     3       Pass     5♣       
All Pass 
1 Precision 

After long thought, West led a spade and declarer claimed 11 tricks. On the d.gif (109 bytes)A lead (and a diamond continuation), the contract would fail. Declarer would have to play spades himself and would be disappointed that the s.gif (111 bytes)Q would not provide an entry to dummy's h.gif (112 bytes)A. East could win the s.gif (111 bytes)A and exit in diamonds and sit back with his second spade trick. Anyway, they don't always make the right lead, and I was pleased with our plus 400. So, not only was it right to be in five clubs, but hearts plays so poorly that the limit of the hand in that strain is only 8 tricks! (The other table also played 5c.gif (113 bytes) making 5 for a push).

Soon after that freak result, I picked up this hand:

s.gif (111 bytes) A Q J 9 8 7 5
h.gif (112 bytes) 9 8 7
d.gif (109 bytes) --
c.gif (113 bytes) A K 4

At unfavorable vulnerability, I opened a strong club (points schmoints). At least I had 1 more HCP than David has for his big club on the previous deal.  LHO jumped to 5d.gif (109 bytes). This is not a good auction for a strong-club system. After long thought my partner jumped to 6NT. Again, this was not what I had in mind. Should I table another long suit in dummy? Should I bid 7s.gif (111 bytes)? I didn't know what to do. I guessed to pass and the full deal was:

Dealer North
NS Vul
     Larry
     ♠ AQJ9875
      987
      -
     ♣ AK4
West      East
♠ 632     ♠ -
 J10543   62
 3        AQJ987654
♣ QJ52    ♣ 103
     David
     ♠ K104
      AKQ
      K102
     ♣ 9876
West     Larry    East     David    
         1♣1      5       6NT      
All Pass 
1 Precision 

On any lead the result would be +1440 -- 12 tricks. Had I bid 7s.gif (111 bytes), we'd make it on the d.gif (109 bytes)A lead, but go down otherwise (there was no squeeze). We'll never know. The other table played in game, so we won 13 IMPs.

But, for this pair of deals, it was strange that on neither one did I get to play in my AQJ-eighth or AQJ-seventh suit. In both cases, I landed on my feet. We went on to win our quarterfinal match, but that set us up for the drama of the semifinals. (See Page 2 of http://www.usbf.org/usbc_db10.pdf)

RETURN TO LARRY'S ARTICLES
RETURN TO LARRY'S HOMEPAGE